Advertisement
  
  

Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
Who's Online
We have 48 guests and 8 members online
  • Blanch_Bindless4bce
  • Shoutbox
    Polls
    How worried are you about the economic meltdown?
      
    Syndicate

      


    Event Calendar
    January 2009
    S M T W T F S
    282930311 2 3
    4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    18 19 20 21 22 23 24
    25 26 27 28 29 30 31
    Upcoming Events
  • Peace Rally, Regina
  • - Sat, Jan 3rd, 2009, @1:00pm- 2:00pm
  • Refugee Fundraiser at Lydia's Pub, Saskatoon
  • - Thu, Jan 8th, 2009, @9:00pm- 2:00am
  • Tar Sands - Mike Hudema Talk, Regina
  • - Tue, Jan 20th, 2009, @7:00pm- 9:00pm
  • Evening of Hope for Congo - Regina
  • - Sat, Jan 24th, 2009, @6:00pm- 9:00pm
    News Feeds
    Activista Search


     
        
    Pathway ::  Home arrow News arrow International arrow Video Raises Questions About Police FTAA Actions in Miami

    Video Raises Questions About Police FTAA Actions in Miami PDF Print E-mail
    Written by Crystal   
    Wednesday, 09 August 2006

    This comes from http://cbs4.com/topstories/local_story_220221644.html , where there is a video feed of some terrible things from that protest. Here is the article:

    Deputies Seen Joking About Shooting One Protester
    One Officer Refers to Protesters as 'Cockroaches'

    (CBS4 News)
    MIAMI A newly released video, which appears to show Broward Sherriff’s Office deputies joking over the use of force against anti-FTAA protesters in Miami during a November 20, 2003 protest, is raising questions about the possibility officers were encouraged to use force against protesters, and praised for that use of force.

    A front page story appearing in the Wednesday editions of The Miami Herald, a CBS4 news partner, details how BSO deputies are seen on their own training video, talking about the protesters’ confrontation with police.  One of those protesters was attorney Elizabeth Ritter, who says was standing with protesters when she was shot in the leg by a rubber bullet, apparently fired by BSO deputies.

    Wearing a red suit and heels, Ritter took a scrawled sign protesting totalitarianism and marched in front of officers, complaining that they had shot her.

    Her actions were caught by a videographer documenting the protesters.

    When the deputies opened fire again on the protesters, causing many to run for cover, the video captured Ritter ducking in the street, shielding herself with her sign.

    That’s when she was struck by a second bullet, which went through the sign and appeared to hit her in the face.

    As a protester, she stood out in her red suit, and apparently, the deputies noticed as well. In the BSO video tape, recorded at a briefing the following day, a BSO commander was heard praising the actions of the officers, and mentioned Ritter not by name, but by a clear description.

    “The good news about being able to watch you guys live on TV,” said BSO Sgt. Michael Kallman, captured on the tape, “was the lady with the red dress.”

    The officers broke into cheers and applause, and Kallman continued, “I don’t know who got her, but when it went through the sign and smack dab into the middle of the head…” and again, the officers broke into catcalls and applause.

    Another officer was captured on camera referring to the protesters as ‘scurrying cockroaches’, and handed what appeared to be an article of intimate female clothing to another officer, saying it had been collected from a protester and warning him “It probably needs to be washed first.”

    Ritter never saw that video until last month, and even though she decided not to take action against her treatment in the days following the protest, she was so infuriated with the comments that she has no decided to sue.

    Her complaints will join those of a long list of people, including a labor leader, a journalist, and a filmmaker who have either filed complaints or lawsuits over the actions of police. Six lawsuits have been backed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

    Ritter says she protested because she was angry about what she saw as police overkill, telling The Herald that “"My city, my hometown, was becoming a police state.” For her protests, Ritter claims she was shot 5 times with rubber bullets.

    "I turned around and said, 'Why did you hit me?' Is a woman in a business suit a threat?" Ritter said. "But then I thought, 'That must have been a mistake.' A police officer isn't going to shoot me on purpose."

    Ritter said the left the protest and went home, not knowing about the post-protest police comments until a month ago, when the existence of the tape, obtained as part of the Miami Civilian Investigative Panel investigation into the FTAA protests, was reported on by the Daily Business Review.

    The CIP Report criticized the fact that officers could not be individually identified during the protests, making actions against individuals difficult. It stated police generally acted professionally, with some exceptions.

    The Herald article reported that experts believe officers faced threats during the protests which were not readily visible or reported, and claimed the reaction captured in the videotape was simply cops in coming off a tense day letting off steam.

    "I'm not excusing what they said, and it probably doesn't sit well with the public," Eugene O'Donnell, Professor of police science at New York's John Jay College of Criminal Justice, told The Herald. "But it's not unheard of for cops to talk in a kind of locker room way."

    Ritter, interviewed by The Herald, disagrees. "I was not a threat to them," she said. "Referring to people as cockroaches is wrong…the law, I know, will agree with me."

    No disciplinary action has been taken against any officers on the video, according to a BSO spokesman.

    Comments

    Only registered users can write comments.
    Please login or register.

    Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

    Last Updated ( Wednesday, 09 August 2006 )
    < Previous   Next >


    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners. Opinions expressed in articles within this site are those of their owners and may not reflect the opinion of ActUpInSask.org, its staff, or its associates.