|
|
|

|
Upcoming Events |
Peace Rally, Regina- Sat, Jan 3rd, 2009, @1:00pm- 2:00pm
|
Refugee Fundraiser at Lydia's Pub, Saskatoon- Thu, Jan 8th, 2009, @9:00pm- 2:00am
|
Tar Sands - Mike Hudema Talk, Regina- Tue, Jan 20th, 2009, @7:00pm- 9:00pm
|
Evening of Hope for Congo - Regina- Sat, Jan 24th, 2009, @6:00pm- 9:00pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pathway :: Home
|
Straight from the premier's mouth |
|
|
|
|
Contributed by John W. Warnock
|
|
Friday, 29 December 2006 |
Why is there no real political debate in Saskatchewan? The main reason was revealed by Premier Lorne Calvert in his end of the year interview in the Leader-Post, December 28, 2006.
Murray Mandryk: You say young people are being attracted to Saskatchewan because of its social democratic values, yet look at what you've done this year in terms of corporate tax breaks. These aren't really traditional social democratic issues.
Lorne Calvert: No, no, no. They may not be (traditional NDP) issues, but from Day 1 -- 1944 on -- one of the fundamental provisions of the NDP-CCF government has been a strong economy. The mechanisms have changed. No doubt about that. But it's been fundamental that you have to have a strong economy. The tools have changed, but I'm a pragmatist in that regard.
Murray Mandryk: Is this debate (over philosophy) relevant at all because so much of this year has been on the political party's personalities? Do you see it (shaping up) as a battle of political personalities?
Lorne Calvert: It may be that in some ways because I've heard very little from the Official Opposition in terms of any policy definition. There's nothing really to debate in terms of policy definition.
Other pragmatic policies: Cutting resource royalties while prices are skyrocketing and corporations have higher profits than ever before. Cutting the income taxes of those in the highest income brackets. Cutting grants to municipalities and school boards resulting in higher property taxes. Supporting and financing corporate hog barns. Strong support for genetically engineered crops and foods. Support for rail line abandonment and the closing of profitable grain elevators. Eliminating provincial grants to regional parks. Freezing social assistance payments to disabled citizens, forcing them to try to live on $650 per month. Pushing nuclear power. Strongly supporting Weyerhaeuser's policy of clear cut logging. And so on.
Could this be why only 57% of eligible voters went to the polls in the 2003 election? Or why the NDP today is so far behind the pathetic Saskatchewan Party in recent public opinion polls?
A few years back Grant Devine told the Leader-Post that he was pleased to see that the NDP government had finally seen the light and had adopted his government's policy direction.
|
C'mon Written by hugo chavez on 2006-12-30 23:49:12 Easy there Jack all this talk and the SP will get a majority and then the real policies come out. Promoting a little economic stimulus will not hurt anyone. If done properly will actually help people because a job is better then a government cheque. I know the NDP is governing well when the right is pissed off and far left is whining. It means they are doing the right thing. Pragmatism is the hallmark of a good government, remember POGG ? The NDP hasn't been perfect but they are much better then the alternative. Not to mention, a vote for the Green's is a vote for the SP.
| Where do we go from here? Written by warnock on 2006-12-31 19:01:26 I think that anyone who follows Sask politics knows that the NDP is going to lose the next election, no matter what. The indications are there in the Weuburn bye-election and the last two polls. No one can really beliieve that the NDP can overcome the 48 to 31 percent deficit in recent polls. If you talk to people who are generally apolitical, they wil tell you the NDP has been in office too long and it is time for a change. They do not fear the Sask Party. How could they be that much different from the NDP? If the NDP suffers a major defeat, as seems likely at this time, it could be a disaster for them. Given the trend to the right in North America, it may mean that they will not get back in government again. This is not far fetched. Here in SK we can see that in the last two federal elections, the vote for the NDP has dropped to 25%, which seems to be their hard core supporters. I have already met many people who have always voted for the NDP who say they are going to support the Liberals in the next federal election, and who blame Layton for bringing down the Liberal government and giving us the Harper government. So it seems to me that the real political question is where should we go from here? The Greens in SK are very different from the new federal party, changed in the past five years. The federal Greens proudly procaliam that they are "neighter left nor right" indicating that they see themselves between the CRAP party and the NDP. This is absolutely no alternative. Here, the SK Greens are the only party defending the welfare state, as well as demanding ecological politics. But are they a real alternative hers?
| Where do we go from here? Written by warnock on 2006-12-31 19:01:29 I think that anyone who follows Sask politics knows that the NDP is going to lose the next election, no matter what. The indications are there in the Weuburn bye-election and the last two polls. No one can really beliieve that the NDP can overcome the 48 to 31 percent deficit in recent polls. If you talk to people who are generally apolitical, they wil tell you the NDP has been in office too long and it is time for a change. They do not fear the Sask Party. How could they be that much different from the NDP? If the NDP suffers a major defeat, as seems likely at this time, it could be a disaster for them. Given the trend to the right in North America, it may mean that they will not get back in government again. This is not far fetched. Here in SK we can see that in the last two federal elections, the vote for the NDP has dropped to 25%, which seems to be their hard core supporters. I have already met many people who have always voted for the NDP who say they are going to support the Liberals in the next federal election, and who blame Layton for bringing down the Liberal government and giving us the Harper government. So it seems to me that the real political question is where should we go from here? The Greens in SK are very different from the new federal party, changed in the past five years. The federal Greens proudly procaliam that they are "neighter left nor right" indicating that they see themselves between the CRAP party and the NDP. This is absolutely no alternative. Here, the SK Greens are the only party defending the welfare state, as well as demanding ecological politics. But are they a real alternative hers?
| What's going on here? Written by warnock on 2006-12-31 19:12:50 I punch one key wrong -- after a couple of Irish whiskeys -- and what happens is I am cut off and for some reason I cannot edit what I have written and it appears duplicated as above? In any case, what are we to do? As some know, I was a candidate for the New Green Alliance in the last two provincial elections, in Regina Elphinstone. This is Allan Blakeney's riding, where he would regularly win with 70% of the vote. In 1991 Lingenfelter got 4600 voter here and in 2003 Warren McCall got 1800. In fact, only 50% of those elegible to vote were on the voters list. And only 37% of those eligible to vote went to the polls. This does not surprise me at all. As I walked the riding, giving my flyers to the residents, people told me "This should be the NDP platform." But it wasn't, by a long shot. What does this tell us? Let us open the debate about what we should be doing now. Just surrender? | Written by hugo chavez on 2007-01-02 19:39:36 Jack, The social dynamics of that riding has change significantly in the last 35 years, that is main reason for the decline in voter turn out. That and a general apathy towards politics. I can not for see any significant movement to the SGP, they are too radical and are full of democratic Marxists. I imagine given major discontent with the SNDP and a fear of the SP , would lead to voter moving to the SLP. Now that also is improbable. You oppose the NDP because they are too centrist, yet the only other party capable of forming government is full of neo-cons. I think a man of your education could quickly deduce that by not voting for a party that is too middle of the road for you, you would be electing a party on the complete other side of your belief system. What's worse a wishy washy NDP government or a Neo-COn Saskatchewan party government ?
| Regina Elphinstone Written by hugo chavez on 2007-01-04 12:13:47 Jack, Check Sask elections, Warren got over 3,000 votes for voter turnout over 60%. To answer you imminent demise of the S-NDP, polls were very similar in 2003 but the election machine pulled it off. Although, a major defeat might be the best for the party to clean out the deadwood and Marxists.
|
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment 2.0! |
|
Last Updated ( Saturday, 30 December 2006 )
|
Recent Posts
Re:Federal Election [mps055; 30-9-2008, 22:09:40]
Federal Election [pelliott; 7-9-2008, 10:09:26]
The Regina Streets Magazine [Regina Streets; 15-5-2008, 00:05:45]
Enterprise Saskatchewan [Malachi Constants; 13-3-2008, 03:03:32]
Enterprise Saskatchewan [Malachi Constants; 13-3-2008, 03:03:26]
Re:The Pirates of Penzance, SK [barrera; 6-12-2007, 16:12:06]
Re:The Pirates of Penzance, SK [John Hubris; 1-12-2007, 10:12:36]
Re:The Pirates of Penzance, SK [John Hubris; 1-12-2007, 10:12:32]
Re:The Pirates of Penzance, SK [pelliott; 1-12-2007, 07:12:57]
The Pirates of Penzance, SK [John Hubris; 26-11-2007, 23:11:34]
Show updated topics in last 4h - 24h
|
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners. Opinions expressed in articles within this site are those of their owners and may not reflect the opinion of ActUpInSask.org, its staff, or its associates.
|
|
|