Advertisement
  
  

Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
Who's Online
We have 49 guests and 1 member online
  • lorilatta
  • Shoutbox
    Polls
    How worried are you about the economic meltdown?
      
    Syndicate

      


    Event Calendar
    November 2008
    S M T W T F S
    2627282930311
    2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    16 17 18 19 20 21 22
    23 24 25 26 27 28 29
    30 1 2 3 4 5 6
    Upcoming Events
  • Joel Salatin Talk
  • - Tue, Nov 18th, 2008, @7:30pm- 9:00pm
    News Feeds
    Activista Search


     
        
    Pathway ::  Home

    Bill Targets Toxic Chemicals PDF Print E-mail
    Contributed by Jim Elliott   
    Friday, 06 June 2008
    Reprinted from the Windsor Star

    Written by Sarah Schmidt

    Everyday products sold in Canada -- from lipstick to laundry detergent -- would be forced to carry warning labels listing toxic ingredients as hazardous under a private member's bill backed by consumer groups.

    Bolstered by the environmental law group Toxic Free Canada and the Quebec consumer group Options Consommateur, Peter Julian of the New Democrats tabled legislation Thursday requiring that all products sold in Canada have clear warning labels specifying their toxic substances.

    Hazard labelling legislation has already been adopted in the European Union and the State of California.

    Consumers in Europe and consumers in California have the right to know. We're saying that Canadians need that right to know," said Julian, who represents the B.C. riding of Burnaby-New Westminster.

    In Canada, the cosmetics industry must list all ingredients in their products, but there is no provision in legislation for the identification through hazard labelling of any toxic ingredients.

    Personal care products, in particular, contain numerous chemicals and some are known carcinogens, endocrine disruptors, reproductive toxins or immune toxicants. They include lead acetate, ammonium persulfate, phthalates and dimethylamine.

    "You shouldn't have to compare notes from five different sources to figure out what kind of toxic product you're purchasing. The right to know is not the right to do a lot of research so you can eventually find out the health concerns around that product," said Julian.

    Hazard labelling would use distinct symbols or letters for each hazard class, based on scientific evidence compiled by government agencies. For example, all ingredients designated as carcinogens labelled "C" and reproductive toxicants labelled "R." This would be in addition to current hazard labelling that indicates corrosive, flammable or explosive ingredients.

    Mae Burrows, executive director of Toxic Free Canada, came to Ottawa Thursday to lobby for the new bill. The Vancouver-based member of Health Canada's expert panel on international labelling rules for chemicals has been fighting for right-to-know legislation for eight years.

    "As a parent, you do what you can do to protect your children in any way you can."

    Michel Arnold, head of Options Consommateur, was also on hand to promote the bill. They brought a sampling of products containing toxic ingredients that would be affected by the legislation, including cleaning agents, mothballs, weed control products, perfume and hair gel.

    Comments

    Only registered users can write comments.
    Please login or register.

    Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

    Last Updated ( Friday, 06 June 2008 )
    < Previous   Next >


    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners. Opinions expressed in articles within this site are those of their owners and may not reflect the opinion of ActUpInSask.org, its staff, or its associates.