Pathway :: HomeNewsProvincial Competing statements tell different stories about FNUniv
Competing statements tell different stories about FNUniv
Written by IMC Sask
Monday, 01 February 2010
A memorandum to stakeholders from the First Nations
University of Canada board of governors is "too little too late," according to the chair of the university's academic council.
"Current faculty members have suffered personally and professionally for the last five years because of their dedication and commitment to students and the University, and they cannot be allowed to suffer in silence," said Randy Lundy in a media statement. Lundy is also head of the FNUniv English department.
The board stated in its memorandum that FNUniv is on
track with its governance review and "fully expects to achieve a balanced
budget for 2009-2010." The board also stated it was preparing its defence
against charges of unfair dismissal launched by financial officer Murray Westerland,
and that the case is likely to hinge on whether or not Westerland was in fact
an employee of FNUniv or an independent contractor. Westerland claims he was
dismissed after reporting concerns about spending by some FNUniv officials.
"The memorandum...is nothing more than a cynical attempt at damage control,
and by Thursday afternoon the document had become redundant as a result of
statements made by Minister Norris," said Lundy. To read the full text the memorandum and Professor Lundy's media statement for yourself, click on 'read more.'
Full Text of the Memorandum:
MEMORANDUM
To: Students, Staff, Faculty, and
all Stakeholders
From: FirstNationsUniversity of Canada Board of Governors
Date: January 27,
2010
The First Nations University of
Canada Board of Governors met on January 26, 2010 to discuss a series of issues that
have surfaced in the news media, those of which deserve further clarification
to its respective stakeholders and wider community. In summary, the main items
surrounded the status of the external review initiated by the Board of
Governors, recent legal developments, as well as reports on the university’s
finances.
FirstNationsUniversity of Canada fiscal year-end budget projection
Senior Management presented a report
to the Board of Governors on the university’s financial projections to the end
of the current fiscal year, and fully expects to achieve a balanced budget for
2009-2010. The projections are based on the completion of the performance-based
funding requirements of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC). Core funding
continues to flow on a monthly basis from INAC and the Province’s Ministry of
Advanced Education, Employment and Labour (AEEL).
Status of INAC performance-based
funding agreement
In January 2010, INAC released
$1.2-million for the completion of the Senior Management Review and Internal
Operations reports and respective action plans. In addition, INAC has committed
$1,000,000 upon the submission of the Governance report and $250,000 for its
related comprehensive action plan.
Update on governance review
The First Nations University Ad Hoc
Committee expects the Governance Review by Dr. Manley Begay Jr. and Associates
to be submitted on February 18th, 2010. As part of the consultation
process, a draft copy was presented to the Elders on Sunday, January 24th, with
the final report scheduled for presentation to the Board of Governors.
Status of AEEL performance-based
funding
Performance-based funding from AEEL,
which represents a commitment of $250,000, is also contingent upon the
completion of the governance review. In addition, a commitment of $250,000 is
expected to be released from AEEL, as it is related to the completion of the
Senior Management and Internal Operations reviews and associated action plan,
which have already been submitted to INAC.
Additional AEEL funding commitments
Additional financial commitments
from AEEL include $100,000 that relates to the holdback from the initial $1.6-million
commitment. (The Order in Council from October 2008 was tied to the one-time
provincial funding agreement between FNUniv and AEEL to assist with the
collective agreement ratification costs and other operating costs). The
university is also anticipating additional funding support from AEEL in the
amount of $158,000 related to the initial $400,000 agreement that covered the
costs of the development of a strategic and operational review, and additional
governance consultation costs.
Board of Governors’ Audit &
Finance Committee – External review
Last year, the Board of Governors’
Audit & Finance Committee held a meeting on December 6th, 2009 to discuss
allegations brought to their attention by former consultant Murray Westerlund
regarding gaps within university policy. The Committee passed a motion to
conduct an external review of decisions made over a specified period of time (April
1, 2006 to December
31, 2009).
At an emergency meeting on December
7th, 2009,
the Board of Governors approved the motion to proceed with an external review.
The Audit & Finance Committee developed the Terms of Reference on Dec.
16th, 2009
and later received proposals from two accounting firms by the deadline of Dec.
21st, 2009.
Meyers, Norris & Penny (MNP) was selected by the Audit & Finance
Committee, pending a letter of independence, which was later accepted on Jan.
15th, 2010.
As per the Audit & Finance Committee’s Terms of Reference, MNP will focus
on the university’s policies regarding three key areas: Annual Leave, Professional
Development and Travel. The external consultants have since launched the review
and the report is expected to be finished at or near the end of February 2010.
It is the board’s intention to
adhere to the findings in the MNP report and respond in an appropriate manner.
Status of University’s Statement of
Defense
At the Tuesday meeting, the Board of
Governors was also briefed by its legal counsel on the lawsuit against the
university brought forward by Murray Westerlund. Mr. Westerlund’s terms of
employment at the university is the central question being raised in his
lawsuit over “wrongful dismissal.” Whether he was a consultant versus a Senior
Financial Officer at the FirstNationsUniversity since he was retained in 2005 is
the central question that will be brought before the courts. The University is
proceeding with filing its defense.
Information Session with Students
In order to provide more detailed
information, members of the FNUniv Board of Governors and Senior Administration
will be holding an information session for students in the DILLL boardroom at
the Regina campus at 1:00 p.m. on Friday,
January 29th, 2010. Students from the Northern Campus & Prince Albert campus are
invited to join the meeting via video-conference.
The mission of the First Nations
University of Canada is to enhance the quality of life, and to preserve,
protect, and interpret the history, language, culture, and artistic heritage of
First Nations.
Contact Information:
Tina Pelletier
Office of Communications
First Nations University of Canada
Direct: 306-790-5950 ext. 2600
Cellular: 306-530-9228
Statement Regarding Recent
Developments Affecting the First Nations University of Canada,
Friday, January 29, 2010
The Memorandum forwarded from the
FNUniv. Communications Office, January 28, 2010, (attached) is nothing more
than a cynical attempt at damage control, and by Thursday afternoon the
document had become redundant as a result of statements made by Minister
Norris.
The Memorandum is far too little and
far too late, a fact of which our Administration seems completely unaware.
When I suggested the above to
Academic Council and our Senior Adminstrators, one of the latter stated that
the document was “about being open, transparent, and accountable.” To quote
Former CFO Murray Westerlund, speaking in another context, that statement is “hilarious.”
Our administration has never provided Faculty with such updates, even when
specifically requested to do so.
What has become clear since
yesterday (Thursday) is that our Administration is incapable of responding to
the recent and rapidly unfolding developments in any meaningful manner. It is
also clear that our Board and Administration have been left on the sidelines of
ongoing discussions of the future of the institution, if there is to be such a
future.
The Province has been speaking
directly with Chief Lonechild, the University of Regina, and with FNUniv and students,
which is a clear message that they are finished with attempts to move our Board
and Administration from their unwillingness to embrace the kind of meaningful
reforms that would allow the University to be successful once again.
For five years now, since February
of 2005, the Board and Administration of the University have had every
opportunity to enact the changes that need to be made at the University, and
they have consistently refused to do so and have done nothing but fight an
ongoing delaying action.
The Board and Administration are in
no position to enact any form of damage control because there is no controlling
the damage that has been done to the University, not only in the past week but
damage that has been ongoing for five years now.
The statements that came to light
last weekend, made by Murray Westerlund, who was the CFO of the University at
the time the statements were made, have to be understood within the context of
the instability that has plagued the institution since 2005. Far from being a
deviation, the kind of mismanagement, mispending, and possibly
miasappropriation documented in the memos Mr. Westerlund and sent to the
University’s audit committee are emblematic of governance and administrative
failures that have been ongoing.
Rather than making the difficult
choice to deal with ongoing governance and administrative failures, our Board
and Administration did to Mr. Westerlund what they have consistenly done to
dissenters for five years now: they isolated and then fired him. The manner in
which Mr. Westerlund was dealt with is reminiscent of the manner in which Dr.
Shauneen Pete was dealt with when she was Academic VP of the University, one of
the few hopeful periods at the University in the last five years.
As happened with Mr Westerlund, Dr.
Pete was first isolated from the decision making process, slowly stripped of
her ability to do her job, and then fired when she attempted to carry out her
duties with the integrity demended by such responsibility. It should be obvious
to all that any administrator who makes efforts to be “open, transparent, and
accountable” is not welcome in the administration of FNUniv.
There has been ample evidence of
this in the past five years.
In the past week, both Minister
Norris and Chief Lonechild have made it clear that their highest priority has
been to insure the continuity of the students’ educations. That is as it should
be. This University exists first and foremost for and because of the students.
One of the things that seems to have been forgotten by various parties is that
the students are our employers and that the University exists to serve them,
not the reverse. The primary concern for most of us is the welfare and well‐being of our students. Their
dedicated efforts at pursuing their own educations and their courageous words
and actions aimed at saving their University are to be commended in the highest
possible terms.
However, and perhaps in part because
of our own silence and inaction, Faculty members at FNUniv. have been left on
the sidelines of current discussions regarding the future of the University. If
the University, which I still believe can play a unique and vital role in the
future of this province and the country, is to continue to exist in one form or
another, then the voices of Faculty need to be a part of the discussion of what
that future may look like.
I am particularly concerned that
Faculty have been left out of ongoing discussions because the integrity and
quality of our academic programming has never been in question in spite of the
upheavals of the past five years. In fact, and in spite of the difficulties
that underfunding and instability have place upon us, the integrity and quality
of academic programs at the University have been consistently endorsed by various
external stakeholders, such as the AUCC (Association of Universities and
Colleges of Canada), the CAUT (Canadian Association of University Teachers),
and the University of Regina.
The inability of FNUniv. of Canada
to function in the manner expected of a University has always been a result of
inadequate governance and administrative structures, not because of the
inadequacy of our Academic staff or programs. In fact, we offer unique academic
programming by highly qualified academic staff and this is not a need that can
be filled for First Nations students and communities by mainstream
institutions, in spite of their best efforts and intentions.
These considerations need to be at
the center of ongoing discussions about how to achieve some satisfactory
resolution to the current crisis. However, as Minister Norris has stated
publicly, the “status quo” is no loner acceptable. It is no longer acceptable
to external stakeholders, to students, staff, or faculty.
That the status quo is no longer
acceptable seems to be a fact that our Board and Administration have yet to
recognise, let alone accept. The marginalisation of Faculty members from
current discussions should not be accceptable either. Current faculty members
have suffered personally and professionally for the last five years because of their
dedication and committment to students and the University, and they cannot be
allowed to suffer in silence.
To close, I issue an open invitation
to Chief Lonechild, Minister Norris, and U of R President Vianne Timmons to
meet with FNUniv. academic staff at their earliest convenience.
Randy Lundy
(Randy is a Faculty member in and
Head of the Department of English at FNUniv. He also acts as Chair of the
Academic Council, a member of the Executive Committee of Academic Council and a
member of the Executive Committee of the University of Regina Faculty
Association).
Comments
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners. Opinions expressed in articles within this site are those of their owners and may not reflect the opinion of ActUpInSask.org, its staff, or its associates.