Advertisement
  
  

Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
Policy
IMC Sask Editorial Policy
Who's Online
We have 78 guests online
Polls
Shoutbox
Syndicate

  


Event Calendar
February 2012
S M T W T F S
2930311 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
Upcoming Events
No events to display
Activista Search


 
    
Pathway ::  Home arrow Environmental arrow When is a Lake, not a Lake?

When is a Lake, not a Lake? PDF Print E-mail
Contributed by Jim Elliott   
Monday, 17 May 2010

This would seem to be a trick question but for a number of lakes in Canada, it will mean a loss of protection.

Under changes to the regulations (Schedule 2) of the Fisheries Act, a lake can be changed into a tailings impoundment area.  At that point it no longer is considered a natural body of water which, if toxic materials were dumped in it, would be protected by that same Fisheries Act.

There are now a dozen lakes and rivers in Canada that have already begun the process of  being "reclassified" as toxic dump sites for mining companies.  Sandy Pond in Newfoundland will now be a place where Vale Inco, a Brazilian company, can dump 400,000 tonnes of toxic waste a year over the next 15 years.

Vancouver-based Taseko Mines wants to develop an open pit mine 125 kilometres west of Williams Lake, British Columbia.  They will drain the Textan Biny (Fish Lake) and stockpile rock waste and use Fish Creek and Little Fish Lake to dump their toxic tailings.  These tailings pond would clearly poison local water supplies and wipe out fish populations as Taseko River is connected to Little Fish Lake.

As the mining industry makes staggering profits into the billions of dollars, it could certainly afford to use technologies to manage mine waste in a sustainable way. The Canadian Federal Government appears to be complicit in this by allowing the mining industry to degrade our pristine water resources for short-term gain.

Canada’s public freshwater ecosystems are now at risk of being toxic waste dumps rather than being diverse habitat.  When fresh water is valuable as drinking water sources, it seems inappropriate to eliminate them now when climate change is looming.

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

Last Updated ( Monday, 17 May 2010 )
< Previous   Next >


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners. Opinions expressed in articles within this site are those of their owners and may not reflect the opinion of ActUpInSask.org, its staff, or its associates.