Advertisement
  
  

Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
Policy
IMC Sask Editorial Policy
Who's Online
We have 50 guests online
Polls
How much does Regina's city council suck?
  
Shoutbox
Syndicate

  


Event Calendar
May 2012
S M T W T F S
29301 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
Upcoming Events
No events to display
Community Radio

Briarpatch Magazine

Popular
Activista Search


 
    
Pathway ::  Home

No Coal-fired power plants built in US in past 2 years PDF Print E-mail
Contributed by Jim Elliott   
Tuesday, 04 January 2011
 

Even though there are abundant sources of coal, there hasn't been a new coal-fired power plant built in the United States in the past two years.  The current demands are still there as coal is still needed for half of the electrical generating plants in the US.  But if the price of natural gas stays cheap in respect to the cost of coal, the companies that own the power plants will continue to convert the current stock of power plants to natural gas from coal.

"Coal is a dead man walkin'," says Kevin Parker, global head of asset management and a member of the executive committee at Deutsche Bank. "Banks won't finance them. Insurance companies won't insure them. The EPA is coming after them...And the economics to make it clean don't work."

Now coal isn't dead just yet as they have a lot of influence in the politics of energy supply in the United States.  But that is waning.  The EPA is starting to fight the production of greenhouse gases by regulating the amount of carbon dioxide emitted each year, especially for the large emitters like coal-fired power plants.  As coal is the dirtiest of the fossil fuels, there will continue to be pressure politically to either shut down the coal plants or to convert them over to cleaner fuels like natural gas.  it is still currently cheaper to reduce the demand for electricity and shut down the plants than to continue to need the plants running on whatever fuel they might use.
Those, that are trying to move electrical generation in front of the growing international demands of greenhouse gas emissions reduction movement, are going with either carbon capture on the current plants or to convert the coal, first to a cleaner fuel, and then burn it instead of the coal.  Carbon capture will allow them to continue to burn coal but will reduce its output efficiency.  Coal gasification will demand a large pre-burning step which again will be very energy intensive.  Saskatchewan and SaskPower are banking on either process as they have a large supply of relatively easily available coal.  But how long will the politicians or the public wait to see if either process works?  And can they ramp up the technology to a size that can be used on a 300MW power plant?

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 05 January 2011 )
< Previous   Next >


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners. Opinions expressed in articles within this site are those of their owners and may not reflect the opinion of ActUpInSask.org, its staff, or its associates.